Prev: Linksys 54G wireless Problem
Next: Newsgroups demise
From: Your Name on 1 Jun 2010 00:28 In article <michelle-DE9E87.19215931052010(a)news.eternal-september.org>, Michelle Steiner <michelle(a)michelle.org> wrote: > In article > <your.name-0106101402460001(a)203-109-168-122.dial.dyn.ihug.co.nz>, > your.name(a)isp.com (Your Name) wrote: > > > Not only that, but the multi-button mice can be {beep}ingly annoying. > > The first thing I do when setting up any new Mac is turn off the extra > > buttons. Personally I find the "squeeze" button of the Mighty Mouse > > especially annoying, continually "going off" when I don't want it to > > just because I'm moviing the mouse around. > > That's the only button on that mouse that I turned off. > > Ergonomically, the best mouse (for right handers) that I've ever had was > the Microsoft Intellimouse Explorer and its successors. Unfortunately, > after two or three years, it became very inaccurate, jumping a bunch of > pixels at a time when I moved it. After going through three of them like > that (both the wired and wireless versions), I gave it up for the Mighty > Mouse. It may just have needed cleaning, or maybe the wires were coming adrift at the mouse end. > The MM had its own problems as well, namely the scroll ball gunking > up and the lack of usable side buttons, so I'm now using the Magic Mouse. > The only thing I miss about it is the third button; I don't miss the side > buttons any more because multitouch with Magic Prefs makes a good > replacement for them. I used lots of Mighty Mice and know quite a few people using them, and there's never been a problem with a "gunky" scroll ball. The only problem I've had with the scrollball is keep trying to use the non-existant one on a couple of older Apple Mice or my own ADB mouse. :-)
From: Your Name on 1 Jun 2010 00:29 In article <jollyroger-71E6DC.22241231052010(a)news.individual.net>, Jolly Roger <jollyroger(a)pobox.com> wrote: > In article <310520101931461407%nospam(a)nospam.invalid>, > nospam <nospam(a)nospam.invalid> wrote: > > > In article <michelle-7C43B5.19234931052010(a)news.eternal-september.org>, > > Michelle Steiner <michelle(a)michelle.org> wrote: > > > > > > > And claiming unilaterally that it can't tether with AT&T when it can > > > > > is even more misleading. > > > > > > > > not when 90% of iphone users don't jailbreak it isn't. > > > > > > Yes it is because it denies the fact that you can tether with AT&T via > > > jailbreaking. > > > > then apple only had an exclusive with at&t for just a couple of months, > > since you could use t-mobile or any other carrier since fall, 2007. > > That has nothing to do with the current discussion. That's because the "current discussion" is about Apple mice. ;-)
From: Who Dat? on 1 Jun 2010 08:50 Michelle Steiner wrote: > In article <j9h806psss6da5ltdgu40r4v8g309e1rm6(a)4ax.com>, > Jeff Liebermann <jeffl(a)cruzio.com> wrote: > >> Ok, so why duz Apple continue to ship one button mice and laptops with >> one button touchpads? > > Apple hasn't shipped a one-button mouse five years. > > Apple's touch pad doesn't have any buttons; the touch pad itself acts as a > button. One finger for the left button; two fingers for the right. For > that matter, it can sense up to five fingers. That's AAPL for ya.... Always thinking of the fisting fanboi and fangirl...
From: Jolly Roger on 1 Jun 2010 09:25 In article <your.name-0106101629510001(a)203-109-166-105.dial.dyn.ihug.co.nz>, your.name(a)isp.com (Your Name) wrote: > In article <jollyroger-71E6DC.22241231052010(a)news.individual.net>, Jolly > Roger <jollyroger(a)pobox.com> wrote: > > > In article <310520101931461407%nospam(a)nospam.invalid>, > > nospam <nospam(a)nospam.invalid> wrote: > > > > > In article <michelle-7C43B5.19234931052010(a)news.eternal-september.org>, > > > Michelle Steiner <michelle(a)michelle.org> wrote: > > > > > > > > > And claiming unilaterally that it can't tether with AT&T when it > > > > > > can > > > > > > is even more misleading. > > > > > > > > > > not when 90% of iphone users don't jailbreak it isn't. > > > > > > > > Yes it is because it denies the fact that you can tether with AT&T via > > > > jailbreaking. > > > > > > then apple only had an exclusive with at&t for just a couple of months, > > > since you could use t-mobile or any other carrier since fall, 2007. > > > > That has nothing to do with the current discussion. > > That's because the "current discussion" is about Apple mice. ;-) Touche? : ) -- Send responses to the relevant news group rather than email to me. E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my very hungry SPAM filter. Due to Google's refusal to prevent spammers from posting messages through their servers, I often ignore posts from Google Groups. Use a real news client if you want me to see your posts. JR
From: Jolly Roger on 1 Jun 2010 09:38
In article <310520102037308059%nospam(a)nospam.invalid>, nospam <nospam(a)nospam.invalid> wrote: > In article <jollyroger-71E6DC.22241231052010(a)news.individual.net>, > Jolly Roger <jollyroger(a)pobox.com> wrote: > > > > > Yes it is because it denies the fact that you can tether with AT&T via > > > > jailbreaking. > > > > > > then apple only had an exclusive with at&t for just a couple of months, > > > since you could use t-mobile or any other carrier since fall, 2007. > > > > That has nothing to do with the current discussion. > > sure it does. > > it's possible to use an iphone on other carriers even though it's > unsupported. > > works both ways. Then how is it so hard for you to admit that you can indeed tether the iPhone on AT&T? -- Send responses to the relevant news group rather than email to me. E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my very hungry SPAM filter. Due to Google's refusal to prevent spammers from posting messages through their servers, I often ignore posts from Google Groups. Use a real news client if you want me to see your posts. JR |